With the continuous development of the real estate market, the use of public areas has increasingly become the focus of home buyers. In some cities, some developers have included public areas in the calculation of house prices in order to increase the price of houses, which has led to some owners' dissatisfaction with the right to use public space. In response to this phenomenon, some experts recently said that the shared area should be abolished to enhance the purchase intention of home buyers.

According to experts, many cities in our country currently have the problem of too much public space and cannot be used rationally. For example, in some high-rise residential areas, due to narrow building spacing, public areas are often occupied, resulting in residents unable to share public facilities. In addition, some developers pay too much attention to profit maximization in design, ignoring the actual needs of residents, which further exacerbates the problem of too much public space.

In this regard, experts suggest that legal means should be used to standardize the calculation method of the public share area to ensure its fairness. At the same time, the government should also strengthen the supervision of the real estate development industry to prevent developers from abusing the public share area to hype prices. In addition, for those cases where the existing public share area is too large to meet the actual needs, reasonable adjustment plans can be adopted to make the owners more satisfied.

In general, the abolition of the shared area is one of the key measures to solve the problems existing in the current real estate market. Only by realizing the true meaning of "one house, one price" can we truly enhance the purchase enthusiasm of home buyers and promote the healthy development of the real estate market.